Rent control is the Trojan horse issue of next month's Minneapolis city election.
City Council candidates are not saying much about it. However, if the election tips the council's majority from moderate-to-progressive Democrats to progressive-to-socialist Democrats, then look for them to attempt new restrictions on the market and pricing power of landlords.
I'm against rent control on principle because the most expeditious way to keep housing costs in line is to encourage building and let competitive forces work.
While markets can become distorted, that's not now the case in Minneapolis. The slowing growth of the metro area and a spate of building in recent years has kept rent increases at a lower trajectory than in other metro areas.
Rent control could slow the region's growth even more by causing developers and their bankers to scale back new building in Minneapolis. That happened two years ago in St. Paul after voters passed a ballot initiative capping rent increases at 3%.
Initially, that cap even applied to new construction and affordable housing, but the St. Paul City Council loosened the restriction last fall.
This year, multifamily construction in the entire Twin Cities metro accounted for 52% of new construction permits through September. That's down from nearly 70% in the same period last year, says Housing First Minnesota, the building industry trade group.
In part, that's because new construction of apartments has dropped off sharply in St. Paul. Property values also fell, leading city officials to raise the property tax 15% for this year. And renters who get into disputes with landlords say the city's apparatus for enforcing rent control is inadequate.