DULUTH – The city should keep investing tourism tax dollars to keep troubled Spirit Mountain afloat and growing, a task force says — the economic impact is worth it.
"Every dollar of tourism tax appropriated to Spirit Mountain generates $18.72 in economic impact," says a lengthy report released Monday with recommendations on how to get the public ski hill on better financial footing following several city bailouts.
The Duluth City Council will now have to decide how to pursue one of the report's biggest recommendations — investing another $23 million in Spirit Mountain to update and upgrade its facilities. Since the recreation area was formed in 1973, the city has spent $19.8 million in tourism taxes and issued $19.3 million in bonds to support operations and infrastructure there.
The proposed upgrades would see Spirit "achieving healthy operating margins that would allow it to weather weaker seasons, reinvest in maintenance and service its debt toward being a self-sustaining operation," ski industry consultants SE Group found in a study of the mountain. "The recommended investments include a new lift, upgrades to the beginner terrain and lighting, improvements to summer offerings and significant investment [in] the Skyline Chalet and other aging infrastructure."
The task force did not recommend a specific dollar amount the city should spend beyond saying the tourism tax allocation should be consistent and meet Spirit Mountain's needs. The 16-member group instead offered strengths and weaknesses of different investment levels.
"It's clear there's infrastructure that needs reinvesting, which is not surprising with a business that has struggled with cash flow in the past five to 10 years," said Arik Forsman, Duluth City Council member and co-chair of the Spirit Mountain task force. Fellow council member Janet Kennedy is the other co-chair of the group.
The Spirit Mountain task force was formed last summer following a $235,000 city bailout in December 2019 and a pandemic-induced summer closure that required $300,000 more in tourism tax money to get the mountain open again for the ski season.
Though the mountain is able to sustain itself with existing city subsidies — an average of $1.2 million annually in the past five years, all paid from tourism tax collections — it is unable to catch up on deferred maintenance or capital investments.