I grew up on Lake Michigan in Wisconsin and moved to Duluth 11 years ago to do a master's degree in water resource science, studying erosion in streams in the area. After my master's, I worked for about seven years, first coordinating habitat restoration projects in the St. Louis River and then assessing ecosystem health in the larger Great Lakes as a fellow stationed at the Environmental Protection Agency's Great Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Lab in Duluth. I realized how entangled our social systems are in the environment. I realized that all ecosystem assessments depend on a value judgment for what constitutes "healthy." In other words, nature just does nature; people are the ones who decide what is considered "good" or "bad." I became interested in how we can improve environmental management through a better understanding of the inherent connections within social-ecological systems, rather than trying to study the environment as separate from people, which is much more common in environmental science. That led me to pursue my Ph.D. research on cultural ecosystem services, which are the intangible ways that people benefit from the environment (spirituality, tradition, sense of place, mental health, inspiration, recreation). My Ph.D. focuses on local aquatic ecosystems: the St. Louis River estuary, Lake Superior, and tributary streams. It includes a public survey. At the project website, z.umn.edu/waterwaybenefits, people can learn more, and residents of the Twin Ports region can take the Waterway Benefits Survey.
Why does this research matter?
A huge amount of funding is going into cleaning up degraded and contaminated Great Lakes coastal areas, including the St. Louis River estuary, through the federal government's Great Lakes Restoration Initiative. The recent Bipartisan Infrastructure Law included $1 billion for the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative. However, there's a poor understanding of how those investments benefit communities aside from economic impacts. It is also unclear who in the community benefits — are the investment outcomes equitable? The goal of my research is to better understand how people experience those intangible benefits from the estuary and the water, and how various components of their identity (age, ethnicity, race, gender, income, culture) influence their experiences with the estuary and the water.
Biology undergraduate, with emphasis on ecology, evolution and behavior
Why did you want to do this research?