Opinion editor's note: Editorials represent the opinions of the Star Tribune Editorial Board, which operates independently from the newsroom.
•••
The vast majority of this state's county attorneys make a strong argument in asking the Minnesota Judicial Branch to restore access to a computer system that provides timely, accurate information about legal cases.
Not being able to use the Odyssey Assistant program is slowing workflows and creating potential public safety issues, the attorneys argue.
The state's court system should heed their concerns. If it is unable to restore the terminated program, it should be replaced with a system that provides the needed information in a similar way.
Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty wisely brought county attorneys together last month to object to the decision to end Odyssey. In a story first reported by KARE 11, the attorneys wrote about their urgent concerns about the burdens placed on their staff as they try to access court calendars and review warrants.
Nick Kimball, a spokesman for Moriarty's office, told an editorial writer that a major issue for county attorneys is access to criminal history. They now have to search long lists where it's not necessarily clear if there was a conviction or when the case occurred, so convictions can be missed.
Staff in county attorneys offices might be able to see a warrant, but it may be unclear whether it is still active. Kimball added that smaller counties have significantly fewer resources and may only have one elected attorney and a handful of staff. Losing the single platform for critical information a major problem for them.