ROCHESTER – If the Rochester school district wants to move away from designated police in schools, it will have to navigate a host of complex issues to make up for that security.
That's the message consultants gave to the Rochester school board Tuesday. The board appears poised to keep in place a contract with local police to provide school resource officers (SROs) for the district.
Yet some board members continue to question whether SROs are appropriate for an increasingly diverse student population given the racial tensions over policing in the U.S. in recent years.
Board members approved adding a sixth officer earlier this year after district officials found SROs were swamped addressing issues across the district, including at two new schools that opened last fall. At the time, several board members wondered whether adding another officer was best for students.
The board in March directed Superintendent Kent Pekel to explore alternatives to SROs.
This isn't the first time policing in schools has come up in Rochester, as the district has debated whether to keep SROs in classrooms before George Floyd's death at the hands of Minneapolis police in 2020 kicked off national conversations and civil unrest.
Proponents say school resource officers help make schools safer; critics say a police presence escalates behavioral and racial conflict in the classroom.
Rochester's board updated and approved the district's SRO contract in June, which fleshes out boundaries between SROs and district officials when it comes to student discipline. The district has been studying SRO contact in schools as part of its strategic plan.