Early Tuesday morning, the posts on social media and chat rooms made it clear that Target Corp. was getting on with the hard work of laying off hundreds of people at its Minneapolis headquarters.
The meetings all came off at 8:45, and no one who got an invitation could have been surprised at what was coming. Last week, the company, as almost an afterthought in an overview of its strategic plans, said up to "several thousand" headquarters jobs would go.
And so it happened, 1,700 employees all told they no longer had a job. They picked up their personal stuff and walked out into the sunshine of a glorious Minnesota spring day — a day that clearly marks the end of an era at the bluest of the state's blue-chip companies.
When the confirmation from the company Tuesday morning indicated 1,700 people were let go, the thought here turned immediately to how a company could possibly lay off that many employees in a morning. No company, however big and efficient, can manage that unless it lays people off in groups.
That's exactly what happened.
The posts on social media about the job losses had so many acronyms related to Target's bureaucracy that it was difficult to understand who actually got laid off. It was clear, though, that whole teams of people were out.
That, too, could have been foreseen. When the company said "several thousand" of its 13,000 or so headquarters employees in and around Minneapolis would go, it was obvious this wasn't going to be a case of cherry-picking the poor performers and sending them home.
It wasn't going to be any 5 percent reduction across the board.