The financial writer Suze Orman may be the highest profile baby boomer to blast the hopes of some younger workers to retire maybe 30 years early as just ridiculous, as she put it in a popular podcast.
To most of us it probably does sound at least a little ridiculous to try to build up enough savings in a dozen years or so to call it a career. But to question something like a rate of return assumption or how much you would need to save to quit at 35 seems to miss the point of this popular movement.
Focusing on these details sure makes it harder to see any useful lesson in what the FIRE enthusiasts are trying to do.
FIRE, a catchy acronym for "financial independence, retire early," isn't really about a sensible plan to retire at age 30 or 35. It's about willingly trading away material things that don't add that much to your life anyway for the flexibility to live without needing a paid job.
That might not be a bad way to live even if you plan to retire at 70.
It's easy to find lots of examples of this thinking just from FIRE bloggers here in the Twin Cities, who generally seemed to be both entertaining and informative.
The FIRE bloggers like pen names, which makes sense given that it seems normal to post family net worth down to the penny on the internet. Here in the Twin Cities the bloggers include Cubert, writing at Abandoned Cubicle, and the Financial Panther and Krystel at All She Saves.
Cubert, who appears to be in his mid-40s, wrote this summer that he's a year away from retirement. His journey started in 2014, he wrote, when he was so overwhelmed with a busy job in information technology and two young children at home that he started looking into early retirement. He quickly found the blog of Mr. Money Mustache.