Thomas Ray Duvall, a serial rapist who has spent more than 30 years locked up for a series of violent rapes of teenage girls in the 1970s and 1980s, has been approved for conditional release from the Minnesota Sex Offender Program (MSOP).
In a one-sentence ruling Tuesday, the Minnesota Supreme Court rejected a request by the Minnesota Department of Human Services to review Duvall's petition for conditional discharge, which had been approved in July by an appeals court panel.
The decision brings to a formal close an acrimonious five-year legal battle over the future of Duvall, one of the most violent and high-profile sex offenders in state history.
His case was closely watched as a test of Minnesota's civil commitment system, which confines sex offenders indefinitely after their prison terms end, and whether courts are willing to defy public outrage in determining if a convicted offender poses a public threat.
In this case, the judges acknowledged that Duvall still has a risk of reoffending, given his extraordinarily violent history and pattern of deviant sexual thoughts. Yet those concerns were outweighed by Duvall's model behavior at the MSOP and the opinion of the state's own treatment team, which overwhelmingly supported his petition.
The ruling also signals a shift in the way judges and the state are handling sex offender cases. In June 2015, U.S. District Judge Donovan Frank ruled that Minnesota's sex offender program was unconstitutional, calling it a "punitive system" that violates offenders' rights to due process. Although Frank's ruling was later overturned by a higher court, specialists at the MSOP have been more willing to support offenders' petitions and state judges have been less likely to override them.
At the time of Frank's ruling, only three offenders had been discharged from the MSOP in its 20-year history — a number cited by attorneys and civil rights advocates as evidence that civil commitment was a "de facto life sentence." Now the number who have been granted provisional discharge (or approved for release with certain conditions) has reached 26. Another three offenders have been released without any conditions, which is unprecedented.
"This [ruling] is an example of the professionals and the courts essentially standing up for what the law has always promised — that civil commitment is not punishment … and lasts only so long as an individual poses a very serious danger," said Eric Janus, a professor at Mitchell Hamline School of Law and author of a book on sex offender laws. "It's based on the principle that people can change."