A federal judge in Minneapolis has ordered West St. Paul officials to allow a convicted sex offender to remain in his home pending the outcome of his lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of a city ordinance restricting where sex offenders can live.
The order, issued by Chief U.S. District Judge John Tunheim Thursday morning, offers a momentary victory for Thomas Wayne Evenstad because the judge found that Evenstad is likely to succeed in his lawsuit.
Despite the fact that federal courts have ruled in favor of sex offender residency restrictions in the past, West St. Paul's rule may be overly restrictive, Tunheim said in his order.
"The case presents a close call," he wrote. "But the court finds simply that West St. Paul has gone too far in the sweep of its ordinance. No one disputes that a city has a strong interest in protecting its citizens. Indeed, a more narrowly drawn ordinance would likely pass muster."
Tunheim was persuaded by Evenstad's lawyers that the city went too far by barring all sex offenders — regardless of any risk assessment — from living within 1,200 feet of schools, day cares, group homes and residential-care establishments. He said the ordinance was doomed in part by the exclusion around group homes.
Adele Nicholas, one of Evenstad's Chicago-based attorneys, said she was pleased with the ruling.
"This is not a final decision," Nicholas said. "But it is a very good step in the right direction."
Cliff Greene, one of the city's attorneys, said the judge found some merit in the city's arguments, even if he didn't rule in its favor.