Christine Mulcahy felt her disgust and revulsion turn to anger as she watched video footage of her frail 75-year-old sister being sexually assaulted by a male caregiver at her senior home in Burnsville.
The aide, John Akonkoh, 53, could be seen repeatedly and aggressively attacking her while she lay naked on her bed at the Regent at Burnsville assisted-living home.
The woman, who had dementia and was partially paralyzed from a stroke, tensed up and flinched as if in pain, according to a criminal complaint filed in Dakota County District Court.
"I cried. I was shaking. I couldn't believe what I was seeing," said Mulcahy, a registered nurse who lives in Apple Valley. "And what he was potentially doing that I didn't know about … just makes you feel ill."
The graphic video footage is now at the center of a legal case that has reignited concerns over patient safety in senior homes, while underscoring the growing role that new video surveillance technology is playing in monitoring care.
Were it not for a tiny $30 camera placed by Mulcahy in her sister's room, the violence likely would have gone unnoticed and the alleged perpetrator might still be working there, Mulcahy and her attorneys said.
Planting cameras — some as small as hockey pucks — in senior homes has grown in popularity since lawmakers four years ago changed state law to explicitly give Minnesotans the right to use cameras and other recording devices in most such facilities.
Advances in video surveillance technology have made it possible for families to monitor the care of their loved ones with remarkable precision and clarity. With devices that cost less than $50, people can now receive automatic alerts on their smartphones when someone enters a resident's room, or when there is unusual activity or sound. Relatives have placed the internet-enabled devices inside potted plants, stuffed animals and atop furniture in their loved ones' rooms.