The company said the claims submitted were for a condition diagnosed during the first plan. So it was a pre-existing connection, not covered in the second.
The situation brings up a big shortcoming in relying on the short-term plans being pushed by the Trump administration as a cheaper alternative to Affordable Care Act (ACA) benefits, according to a new 197-page report from the Health Subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee.
The report recounts dozens of cases of consumers denied coverage for medical conditions because they chose short-term health insurance policies.
The issue has attracted increased scrutiny because the president has asked the Supreme Court to kill the ACA. It comes at a moment when 5.4 million Americans have lost company-paid health insurance because the coronavirus pandemic forced businesses to close.
Roughly half of U.S. states — including Minnesota — restrict or ban short-term health plans to protect consumers.
A spokeswoman for the health insurance industry's major trade group said short-term plans, also called limited-duration health insurance, play an "important role." But they were never envisioned as a long-term substitute for regular health insurance, said Kristine Grow, vice president for communications at America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP).
"When you look at one year and beyond," she said, "it is important [for consumers] to know what they cover and what they don't."
The limited-duration plans are meant to temporarily protect people from catastrophic medical costs if they are between jobs. The premiums can be much less expensive than ACA exchange plans, but co-payments are often very high.