This is a very important week for Major League Baseball. The Twins, in conjunction with Commissioner Bud Selig, are trying to prove that not every All-Star Game held in a new ballpark in the Upper Midwest ends in a tie.
But what if it did? What if the once-wondrous, increasingly uneven history of MLB All-Star Games became further befouled by the dreaded deadlock?
We all complain about All-Star games, even baseball's — which remains easily the best of an increasingly irrelevant bunch — because they're so easy to complain about.
And the complaints hold enough water to rain out the rest of the Twins' season.
The players don't care as much as they once did? True, although this generation seems to care more than the previous generation.
The winner of a midseason exhibition game featuring some players who have no chance of competing in the postseason determines which league receives home-field advantage in the World Series? True. But that change has added urgency to the event.
The rosters are too big and include obligatory representatives from even the worst teams, meaning that even players like Ricky Bones and (sorry to mention this, Coom) Ron Coomer wind up on the field during what should be a relentless celebration of greatness? True. But changing this rule would eliminate any reason for a struggling baseball market to care about the All-Star Game.
The voting is anything but democratic, as fans can find ways to vote an infinite number of times? True … and true.