Opinion editor's note: Editorials represent the opinions of the Star Tribune Editorial Board, which operates independently from the newsroom.
•••
While welcoming students back to school on Tuesday, Gov. Tim Walz told reporters that he's "open" to calling a special legislative session to clarify a new law on restraining students. He ought to do more than consider the possibility.
Without delay, the governor should call on the Legislature to briefly reconvene and revise the statue that is causing some law enforcement agencies to pull student resource officers (SROs) from schools.
Due to newly adopted rules on certain types of holds, an estimated 40 districts are without SROs this year. Those changes were approved during the 2023 legislative session as part of the education bill.
Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison issued a legal opinion that says the law doesn't prevent officers from "reasonable" uses of force. During the Labor Day holiday weekend, Walz said that Ellison's opinion satisfied some law enforcement agencies and school districts, and in those cases SROs returned to work this week.
Still, because of the vagueness of the language, some law enforcement organizations and county attorneys have interpreted it to mean that most physical restraints are prohibited.
Those agencies that decided to end or suspend their agreements to provide SROs just before Minnesota schools reopened are understandably concerned that officers could be held liable if they need to restrict a student's movement in emergency situations.