A renovated Albert Lea biodiesel plant powered by wind and a carbon-offset project by a Minneapolis business that will yield thousands of carbon-absorbing trees are two recent investments that underscore Minnesota's progress in reducing greenhouse gases to combat economic and environmentally disastrous climate change.
Minnesota's growing economy also is greening. The state, for the first time according to the most recent study, is cutting carbon-based pollution as we add thousands of good-paying jobs in renewable energy and conservation technology.
Moreover, Gov. Tim Walz just signed into law a bill designed to cut carbon emissions from electrical generation by 2040, joining more than a dozen other states.
The new standard would require Minnesota utilities, with some exceptions, to phase out coal, natural gas and other fuels that generate planet-warming gases a decade earlier than Xcel Energy, Minnesota Power and Great River Energy had planned.
There will be challenges en route. And we will continue to need nuclear and natural gas-supplied juice for decades. The utilities say it will take investment and technology to clear the 2040 hurdle.
The big utilities have met timelines specified by environmental legislation since 2007. The recent legislation was denounced by some Republican legislators, concerned with cost and reliability. Residential electricity cost in Minnesota is about average for the nation. And wind and solar are now considered the cheapest generators.
State utilities have dramatically decreased carbon emissions since 2005. The biggest sector for carbon emissions now is transportation.
"The 100% carbon-free electricity bill is hugely important because it sends a signal that Minnesota is committed, creates market certainty and opens up the state to more clean energy investment," said Amelia Cerling Hennes, managing director of Clean Energy Economy Minnesota. "If the Midwest was a country, it would be among the top 10 carbon emitters in the world."