Gov. Mark Dayton, benefiting from good timing as we approach a 2014 election year, indicated last week that he wants to cut taxes for business and middle-class Minnesotans, thanks to a newly forecast $1.1 billion budget surplus.
The resurgent Minnesota economy is producing tax revenue faster than anticipated.
Dayton's aides say he may ask the DFL-dominated Legislature to repeal or at least dilute three business-to-business taxes passed last spring. In an interview, Minnesota Revenue Commissioner Myron Frans, a tax lawyer and former small-business CEO, said there will be no specific proposals to legislative leaders until the February budget forecast.
"The governor is focused on his priorities of jobs and a fairer tax system,'' said Frans. "We haven't closed the door on anything over here."
Dayton is believed to be most inclined to repeal a storage/warehouse tax; a tax on repairs that will hit hardest small businesses that don't have their own maintenance staffs, and a telecommunications equipment tax. Dayton didn't advocate for these taxes, but signed them into law last spring.
The Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, blaming Dayton and the DFL-controlled Legislature for a $2 billion-plus tax hike last session to balance a $39 billion two-year budget, wants more relief for business owners. That may happen.
But Frans indicated little relief for high-end earners from an administration that raised taxes on the top 2 percent of income earners from wages and investments in order to make investments in education, middle-class tax relief and infrastructure spending.
"In 2008, the middle-income folks in Minnesota were paying 12.3 percent of household income in state and local taxes, including sales and gas taxes," Frans said. "The top 2 percent were paying 9.7 percent. We project that in 2015, middle income folks [those making $32,000 to $69,000 in total household income] will pay about 12 percent in state and local income taxes. The top 2 percent [making $292,000 and up] in household income will pay about 11 percent. This is the largest upward move in tax progressivity … since we started our tax-incidence reports in 1990."