The Minnesota attorney general's office filed suit Tuesday against a St. Louis Park company that settles credit-card debts, claiming it stacks the deck against consumers and has hidden its ties to debt-collection law firms.
The lawsuit was filed in Hennepin County District Court against the National Arbitration Forum, one of the biggest arbitration companies in the country for consumer credit disputes. It says the company violated state consumer fraud, deceptive trade practices and false advertising laws.
"This is a classic example of the little guy getting stepped on by fine-print contracts," Attorney General Lori Swanson said in announcing the suit at a State Capitol news conference.
In a statement, the company said it stands by its arbitration process and "vigorously disagrees with any allegations of bias in the lawsuit and will defend against them." It added that its legal team is reviewing the complaint.
Swanson said that credit card companies, banks, retail lenders and cell phone companies increasingly place mandatory arbitration clauses in the fine print of their consumer agreements. The consumer agrees -- often without realizing it -- to have any dispute resolved by an arbitrator chosen by the credit card company or another creditor, waiving the right to have it heard in a court of law.
National Arbitration Forum, the suit said, convinces creditors to place those clauses in their agreements and to appoint the company to be the arbitrator should a dispute arise. It portrays itself as being an independent, impartial venue for settling disputes, but Swanson's office says it also has "extensive ties" to the debt collection industry.
"The impartial resolution of complaints is at the foundation of our democracy," she said. "The actions of this company are a threat to justice."
Consumer advocates have criticized the company, which administers hundreds of thousands of arbitration claims each year via about 1,600 arbitrators worldwide, in the past for an alleged bias against consumers. Last year, the city of San Francisco accused it of operating an "arbitration mill" that favored credit card companies. The lawsuit, which is still in litigation, said the company ruled in favor of consumers in just 30 of 18,075 credit-card cases that were heard before its arbitrators between January 2003 and March 2007.