The parents of a transgender child and Nova Classical Academy recently reached a $120,000 settlement and an agreement that revised the school's policy supporting transgender and gender nonconforming students.
Parents Dave and Hannah Edwards said they hope other schools learn from their case. "Hopefully, no other family will have to go through this," Hannah Edwards said.
The controversy began when the parents wanted their child to socially transition at the St. Paul public charter school without fear of being harassed or bullied.
The family withdrew their child from Nova in February 2016 and filed a case with the city of St. Paul, alleging the school was violating the city's human rights ordinance. A year later, the city determined that there was probable cause that the child was discriminated against, prompting the parents and school officials to resolve the issue through mediation.
In a written statement, school officials said they "strongly disagreed" with the probable cause finding but agreed to confidential mediation in hopes of avoiding a costly lawsuit. Last month, both sides reached a settlement and the parents agreed not to sue the school.
The conflict began before the start of the 2015-16 school year when the Edwards family informed Nova that their 5-year-old child was gender nonconforming. They asked the school to protect their kindergartner from harassment and asked that Nova clarify its policies so that their child be allowed to wear any of the approved uniform clothing rather than being restricted to wearing clothing labeled for boys.
Nova attorney Laura Booth said the family and school began working together in late August 2015. She said an antibullying policy was in place that would prohibit harassment against a nonconforming or transgender student. The school hired an expert to train its staff and inform the community to create an environment where the student was "very much accepted" and then a couple of incidents happened, Booth added.
From the school's perspective, the incidents were primarily remarks by 5-year-olds who were curious, Booth said.