After months of study and public testimony, the St. Paul City Council adopted an ordinance Wednesday defining and regulating sober houses.
Council members approved it unanimously, ensuring it would take effect before a yearlong moratorium on new sober houses expires this fall.
A lawsuit is likely, opponents said after the vote.
Regulating the homes for recovering addicts has been a complex issue, with the city trying to square the concerns of neighbors with the rights and safety of sober-house residents.
"We've reached a reasonable balance," said Council Member Russ Stark, who talked about the logic behind the ordinance before calling for the vote.
Sober houses are a valuable part of the community, he said. But, Stark added, neighbors raised valid concerns that the city had no clear definition or guidelines up to this point. It's fair, he said, to place some regulations on the homes to maintain a neighborhood's character.
A city ordinance allows no more than four unrelated people to live together in one dwelling. That would put most sober houses in violation of the law because many house five or more people. But because recovering addicts are a protected class and live as a family unit without services, operators say, they should be granted special accommodations to live in residential neighborhoods.
Existing sober houses will be grandfathered in.