A new apartment project in St. Louis Park would move the city closer to its affordable housing and environmental goals, but like most developments that aim to house low-income Minnesotans, the developer says the building won't work without public financing.
The proposed 60-unit Union Park Flats on Alabama Avenue, next to Union Congregational Church, has received more than $20 million in state tax credits and funds from Hennepin County and the Metropolitan Council, as well as a smaller private loan toward the estimated $28.7 million cost of the building. Still, developer Project for Pride in Living needs $450,000 more, and is looking to St. Louis Park to fill the gap. The money would come from a revolving loan fund for affordable housing, seeded with money collected from the city's tax-increment financing (TIF) districts.
All this public financing is needed, the developer said, because the low rents the building will collect won't be enough to pay a conventional bank loan.
"Because our rents are so low, we don't have enough cash flow," said Mandy Pant, project manager with Project for Pride in Living, a Minneapolis nonprofit.
The proposed Union Park Flats sits just blocks from a future light-rail station, and the developer is planning energy-saving measures and a rain garden. The apartments will be only for individuals and families with low to moderate incomes — people St. Louis Park's medical offices and restaurants are desperate to hire, said Karen Barton, city community development director. Some of the smaller apartments could rent for less than $700 per month, according to Met Council definitions of affordability, and the building will have 15 three- and four-bedroom apartments big enough for families.
Construction is expected to begin by summer.
"These are units that we are very supportive of, from the city standpoint," said St. Louis Park Redevelopment Administrator Jennifer Monson. "Getting more deeply affordable units and family-sized units is a high priority for the City Council."
St. Louis Park has exceeded its goals for building homes affordable for moderate-income people, Barton said, but it is not so far ahead on building units for lower-income people.