The Supreme Court has several options in reviewing California's ballot measure banning the practice and a federal law defining marriage as solely an opposite-sex union.In the California case: It could leave California's ban on same-sex marriage in place unless voters there choose to revisit the question. It could allow same-sex marriage in California but not require it elsewhere. Or it could address the broader question of whether the Constitution requires states to allow such marriages.
Supreme Court: What's at stake
December 8, 2012 at 2:02AM
Defense of Marriage Act: The court also will decide whether Congress can deprive legally married gay couples of federal benefits otherwise available to married people. Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act. Current federal law -- which defines marriage as between only a man and a woman -- requires the federal government to deny benefits to gay and lesbian couples married in states that allow such unions.
Where it's legal: By Jan. 1, same-sex couples will have the right to marry in nine states -- Connecticut, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Vermont, Washington -- and the District of Columbia. In Minnesota, voters in November rejected a bid to amend the state Constitution to bar the practice.
What's next: The cases probably will be argued in March, with decisions expected in June.
about the writer
If it feels like TikTok has been around forever, that's probably because it has, at least if you're measuring via internet time. What's now in question is whether it will be around much longer and, if so, in what form?
