There is still a lot we don't know about the shooting near the Cub store in south Minneapolis, in which a passerby with a permit to carry a gun killed a mugger who had just pistol-whipped a woman. But we now know that Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman does not plan to press charges against the man, whose identity has not been released.
For that, I'm glad.
Freeman didn't release a lot of information about the incident because, technically, it is still being investigated. What he did say is that the man with the gun approached Darren Evanovich, who was rifling through the purse he had just stolen. He asked Evanovich to hand over the purse, but instead Evanovich pulled out his gun and pointed it at him.
The man shot him dead.
In conversations and on blogs and websites, there has been a lot of discussion about whether the guy should have chased after Evanovich. Some have suggested that in doing so, he became a vigilante, seeking to take the law into his own hands. Others countered that everyone has a right to make a citizen's arrest, and thus pursuit of the criminal was allowed. It would be silly to suggest that someone without a gun could pursue a criminal, but someone with one can't.
We don't know how much of the mugging the passerby saw, or whether he knew Evanovich had a gun. We don't know if the man was waving the gun around like Charles Bronson or had it discretely tucked away.
One thing is clear, if Evanovich drew a gun, the man had an absolute right to shoot and to protect himself.
I took firearms classes at the old Minneapolis armory when I was a kid. I've shot guns at ranges a couple of times but didn't find much enjoyment in it. When Minnesota first allowed people to carry guns, I was a little concerned the law would be abused and there would be a lot of situations like the one in south Minneapolis. I was wrong.