Opinion editor’s note: Star Tribune Opinion publishes a mix of national and local commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
The coldblooded killing of police officer Jamal Mitchell last week was the latest in a string of horrific attacks on law enforcement in Minnesota. It is painful to see the footage of this father and young officer who was immensely proud of his work. Mitchell’s death comes on the heels of the killings of Burnsville first responders Matthew Ruge, Paul Elmstrand and Adam Finseth in February and Pope County Sheriff’s Deputy Joshua Owen in April 2023.
Their deaths, and the reality that assaults upon Minnesota police officers have tripled since 2016, remind us of the immensely dangerous work police officers do to keep us safe. Police officers are indeed heroes.
Yet one can’t help at this moment but reflect upon the treatment of these heroes by Minnesota leaders since the murder of George Floyd. Such a review can only lead to the conclusion that our state’s leaders’ conduct toward police these past four years has been unworthy of our state.
The rhetoric directed toward police has been horrendous from all levels of state government. Take, for example, U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar, who screamed into a microphone on June 6, 2020, that “[w]e need to completely dismantle the Minneapolis Police Department” and later that “[y]ou can’t really reform a department that is rotten to the root.”
The Minneapolis City Council joined in, with several members ignominiously expressing an intent to defund the Minneapolis Police Department. They partly succeeded, and despite their failure in the broader defunding effort, they continued to push for the Minneapolis charter amendment with the express goal of ultimately defunding the police. Without an admirable stand from Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey and a few others, Omar and other anti-police extremists might have gotten their wish to dismantle Minnesota’s largest police department.
Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison supported the Minneapolis charter amendment. He seemed to have temporized since taking that indefensible position, but recently he doubled down, reflecting that “[p]olice have been used to maintain social hierarchy. That function is not legitimate, and yet it persists.” Coming from the chief legal officer of our state, it is difficult to imagine a more reckless and contemptible statement, with its insinuations of the maintenance of the slavery system and potential to incite violence against police.