1868: A silly story has been started by the New York Express, to the effect that Gen. George McClellan will be offered the Secretaryship of War by Gen. Ulysses S. Grant, our newly elected president. If Gen. Grant wished to commence his administration by disgusting two thirds of the men who elected him, this would be the most effectual means. Grant's "admiration of McClellan" is certainly a new idea, and creditable to the imaginative powers of the Express.
Daily Tribune, Dec. 24
1870: We have at last got winter, all but the snow. The thermometer marks 20 below zero in the morning, and yields grudgingly to the warmth of the sun. People walk the streets as if they were on very urgent business, and the horses, when not in motion, protest with every hair on their bodies that it is cold. Every man is looking earnestly for snow — and lots of fair maidens are impatiently waiting for that first sleigh-ride.
Daily Tribune, Dec. 24
1876: The London Economist remarks upon the disputed presidential election in this country, saying neither candidate has warned his followers against illegal practices. That journal doesn't seem to understand that with us the dishonesty is always on the other side. The Globe-Democrat denounces talk of compromise, saying the recognition of either Rutherford B. Hayes or Samuel Tilden as president is a small matter. The mass of the Republican party, however, will not regret any compromise which places Hayes in the White House.
A widow residing on Marshall Street, east Minneapolis, complains bitterly of the ill-treatment she receives at the hands of the male portion of the community. This lady, who is striving to earn an honest living, is subjected to all sorts of insults. It is a disgrace to a civilized country that such men cannot be learned a few lessons in common decency.
Minneapolis Tribune, Dec. 22
1881
The disgust and mortification imposed upon every respectable American by the proceedings in the trial of President Garfield's assassin, Guiteau, are not the worst feature of the hideous affair. What will be the effect upon the criminal classes of this spectacle of a vile murderer making a circus of the courtroom? If Guiteau may indulge in this shameless audacity, what may not the felons coming after him venture?