The Timberwolves have a D'Angelo Russell conundrum on their hands

The biggest offseason question doesn't have an easy answer.

May 2, 2022 at 6:26PM
Timberwolves coach Chris Finch, left, benched D’Angelo Russell in the fourth quarter of Game 6 against Memphis. (Craig Lassig, Associated Press/The Minnesota Star Tribune)

The most encouraging and entertaining Timberwolves season in almost 20 years is over.

Counting the play-in game against the Clippers, the postseason lasted a little over two weeks.

And now the offseason will feel like an eternity.

If you think the Wolves are automatically going to continue on an upward trajectory after doubling their win total from 23 to 46 ... well, that's not how this works. Teams rise and fall all the time. Sometimes they stall (see: the 2021-22 Atlanta Hawks).

The things that were good about this year's Wolves won't magically stay good just as their issues won't just be magically addressed.

This year's Wolves certainly benefited from their own internal improvement, but they also took advantage of relatively good health and an atypically weak Western Conference to chart their path forward.

To keep improving means to keep evolving. And for Minnesota it means addressing the biggest conundrum on the roster: D'Angelo Russell.

We don't talk about D-Lo (no, no, no).

Patrick Reusse and I did not talk about Bruno on Monday's Daily Delivery podcast, but we did come to an agreement on this: This offseason cannot, under any circumstances, include an extension for Russell.

As Chris Hine noted a couple days ago, Russell will be eligible to sign a five-year deal for about $40 million per season.

Recency bias can be vicious, but there's no getting around this fact: In the biggest game of the year, with the season on the line, Russell was benched in favor of a former undrafted free agent who couldn't even get on the court earlier in the Memphis series.

Contract-wise, D-Lo probably isn't even worth half of the maximum he could get. But he isn't likely to settle after hitting the jackpot with his last max deal.

On the flip side, the Wolves were 39-26 during the regular season when Russell played and just 7-10 when he didn't. So often this year, their fortunes mirrored those of their point guard. When he made shots — as he did in that play-in game against the Clippers — the Wolves felt unstoppable. When he didn't, they sputtered, particularly late in games.

I can't say the Wolves would be better off in 2022-23 if they traded Russell this offseason because the player(s) they got in return would have their own set of issues.

But it comes down to this: Russell can be part of a playoff core. But at his salary he can't be part of a championship core.

Not when Karl-Anthony Towns is about to get rich. Not when you are going to have to pay Anthony Edwards and possibly Jaden McDaniels in a couple years.

So you want to trade Russell this offseason for a player who either is useful and is on an expiring contract or who is useful and you know you want to keep beyond one season.

Good luck finding a trading partner for a deal like that.

The two most questionable decisions of the Gersson Rosas era were glued to the bench at the end of Game 6: Jarrett Culver for Memphis and Russell for the Wolves.

It required some finesse to turn Culver into a positive in the Patrick Beverley deal. It will take even more to do the same with D-Lo.

about the writer

about the writer

Michael Rand

Columnist / Reporter

Michael Rand is the Star Tribune's Digital Sports Senior Writer and host/creator of the Daily Delivery podcast. In 25 years covering Minnesota sports at the Star Tribune, he has seen just about everything (except, of course, a Vikings Super Bowl).

See More

More from Randball

card image

When he was hired after the disastrous 2016 season to reshape the Twins, Derek Falvey brought a reputation for identifying and developing pitching talent. It took a while, but the pipeline we were promised is now materializing.

card image
card image