Grandma, there are families who want your greater Minnesota house. There are employers who want those families in your house. There are planners who say it would help the rural housing and labor crunch if those families were to occupy the house where you raised your kids instead of one lone retiree in a house full of memories.
But what about you, Grandma? What do you want?
“I’m not trying to kick our seniors out of their home, but … kinda,” Ben Winchester, a University of Minnesota professor who studies rural areas, recently told a group assembled online to talk about the state’s rural housing crunch. “Maybe they shouldn’t be in these four-bedroom, two-bath homes.”
In espousing an idea with so much blowback potential, Winchester does not lack for guts. He told me he’s had people walk out of his presentations, sure that he’s advocating for the forced removal of Grandma or Grandpa from their home.
That is not what Winchester means. Winchester, the mind behind the convention-bending “Rural Brain Gain” report, doesn’t think anyone should be forced to move anywhere. But he says that rural communities would be wise to provide other housing options for seniors whose houses are getting to be too much for them but want to stay in the area. One option is to build patio homes. Grandparents could sell their larger home to young families and use that equity to buy a smaller house that requires less maintenance. Or maybe zoning officials could start permitting accessory dwelling units on city lots.
“The inability of seniors to move out has inhibited the ability for our new labor to move in,” Winchester said.
You can definitely feel the labor crunch across greater Minnesota, especially when restaurants close early or don’t open at all because they don’t have the staff, or when companies can’t boost production because they can’t find workers. I’ve also spoken to professionals who wish they could live in the town where they work but can’t find a place to live. So they commute.
Homeowners in many greater Minnesota counties skew older than those in the Twin Cities, sometimes significantly. In three counties, Aitkin, Traverse and Big Stone, at least 35% of owner-occupied homes are owned by people age 65 and over, while that percentage is 25% or below in the metropolitan area. The crunch is most acute where the economy is thriving and there aren’t enough young workers to take over for those nearing retirement.