When Republican Congressman Pete Stauber of Duluth announced legislation to allow mining near the Boundary Waters earlier this month, he forgot to mention one thing: what the rest of us want.
Stauber wants to overturn a Biden-era protection of a huge swath of federal land upstream of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness, Voyageurs National Park and Canada’s Quetico wilderness. The Biden administration blocked mining there for 20 years, calling the location a “unique natural wonder and one of the jewels of the National Wilderness Preservation System.”
The Biden move temporarily blocked a Chilean-owned mine, Twin Metals, from developing an underground copper-nickel mine 9 miles southeast of Ely, Minn. Stauber, who supports Twin Metals, said he wants to turn Minnesota into a “critical mineral powerhouse.”
Oh, glory. Maybe Stauber can make Minnesota to mining what Iowa is to corn. Wouldn’t that boost our quality of life?
“President Trump is the most pro-mining President in our nation’s history, and I look forward to working with his administration to get important mining projects across the finish line here in Minnesota, and nationwide,” Stauber said in the Feb. 5 statement.
Not a word about making sure the Boundary Waters would be protected from any pollution resulting from new mines. No olive branch to the vast majority of Minnesotans who want to safeguard the Boundary Waters, which includes protecting the waters that feed into the wilderness area.
Never mind that past polls have found that most Minnesotans, including those in northern Minnesota, don’t want mining near the Boundary Waters. Never mind that they have said they value environmental protections over jobs. Never mind that a U.S. Forest Service study found that mining near the Boundary Waters could spill toxic metals and chemicals downstream, hurting fish and risking public health.
I called Stauber’s state office to give him a chance to comment. I never heard back.