A woman and a police officer stood on the Duluth shore, debating whether one of them was legally required to put on a shirt.
"I'm not half-naked," Duluth photographer Michelle Bennett tried to explain to the officer who approached her on Park Point beach last month. "I'm topless."
She and her friends had been swimming topless in Lake Superior for years. They saw no reason to cover up while men — regardless of bust size — were allowed to jump in Lake Superior wearing nothing but a Speedo.
"Men are allowed to do it, so I feel entitled to it as well," she said.
No top, no sitting around waiting for the clammy spandex on your chest to dry. No top, no tan lines.
No top, no troubles — at least, not until last month, when a mother, visiting the beach with her children, called police after Bennett refused to cover up.
What followed was a 45-minute discussion of Minnesota's vaguely worded indecent exposure law, the sexualization of women's bodies in public places and several phone calls back to police headquarters to debate terms like "private parts" and "lewd behavior."
In the end, Bennett did not receive a citation, but she did pull on a shirt — at least until she can find someone in state government who can explain whether a woman's chest legally constitutes a "private area" when men get to let it all hang out.