Sarah Connor usually doesn't mind that her mom, more than 1,000 miles away in Gaithersburg, Md., can follow her every move.
The exception? When the smartphone app that plots Connor's location on a digital map betrays her on the occasional Monday morning.
"She can tell whenever I happen to sleep through my 8 a.m. class," said Connor, 20, a junior at the University of Minnesota.
The app they both use, Life360, shows their locations on a map 24/7, as long as no one hits "Pause." They see it as a safety measure, a little digital peace of mind. Yet mom Lori Connor admits it's tempting to peek, especially on Monday mornings.
"I do call her on it sometimes," Lori Connor said, laughing. "That's when she'll say, 'Mom, stop tracking me.' "
Amid a national debate about online tracking and National Security Agency spying, millions of people like the Connors are choosing to track each other on a more personal level. Using smartphone apps and GPS technology makes it easy to share individuals' locations with a limited circle of relatives and friends. Parents track children. Adult children keep tabs on elderly parents. If the family dog has a propensity to run, why not stick a GPS tag on his collar, too?
Such easily accessible surveillance technology raises all kinds of questions about privacy in a digital era. It makes perfect, practical sense to some — and can be lifesaving when used to find people with dementia who are prone to wander. Others are appalled at the thought of making their location constantly available, even to a loved one.
"You get dramatically different points of view from people about how private they consider their location," said William McGeveran, a law professor at the University of Minnesota. "So much of it is contextual. People who would be happy to have locations tracked within their family would be creeped out if they realized that Google was doing it. Other people have the reverse feeling."