The final out of Wednesday's 3-2 Twins loss felt particularly abrupt. Barely 24 hours earlier, Twins players and fans had entertained notions of winning two games at Target Field against the Astros and advancing to the American League Championship Series, where they would have had the home field advantage against Texas.
Instead, two losses sent them swiftly into the offseason. After 168 meaningful games this year, suddenly there was no game coming up. Instead, questions about the roster for 2024 rushed to the forefront.
Can the Twins sign Sonny Gray and/or Kenta Maeda, rotation mainstays who keyed the team's success this season? If not, can they find suitable equivalents? Will they pick up options on Max Kepler and Jorge Polanco, long-time Twins regulars?
And after the payroll swelled above $155 million this season, what will it look like next year as the Twins' tenuous but important ($54.8 million per year) contract with Bally Sports North expires at the end of the World Series and a less-lucrative but more fan-friendly deal potentially replaces it?
Bobby Nightengale and I talked through a lot of those questions on Friday's Daily Delivery podcast.
But I also talked about this: Would our conversation about the offseason have been forestalled had the Twins benefitted (or at least not been actively harmed) by so many ball-strike calls throughout the postseason? Would Bobby and I have been talking about a Game 5 in Houston on Friday night, for instance, instead of the future?
It's certainly possible if we look at two separate but related calculations.
The first: The site Umpire Scorecards uses ball-strike data from every MLB game to see which teams benefited and which were harmed by pitches incorrectly called one way or the other. Expected runs can shift dramatically on the basis of missed calls, especially if they tilt toward a pitcher or hitter in a key run-scoring situation.