WASHINGTON – Negotiators finalizing sweeping new changes in U.S. farm and nutrition programs could decide the contours of Minnesota's shrinking native prairie.
Among the sticking points in the farm bill talks, long stalled on crop subsidies and food stamps, are provisions protecting grasslands that naturalists say are being depleted at a rate not seen since the Dust Bowl days.
Although the losses have been greater in other Midwestern states such as Nebraska, Iowa and South Dakota, a pair of Minnesota Democrats have taken the lead in pressing for compliance measures and "sodsaver" protections meant to stem the conversion of wetlands and grasslands to agriculture.
But the conservation provisions backed by Sen. Amy Klobuchar and Rep. Tim Walz are so far part of only the Senate version of the farm bill. Decades-old requirements linking certain conservation practices to farm subsidies have been dropped in the bill passed by the Republican-led House, alarming environmentalists who have tracked the loss of prairie during a period of strong commodity prices.
"Once we lose the connection to the direct payments which are the primary farm program that gives us the most bang for our buck, conservation compliance literally goes by the wayside," said Bill Wenzel, agriculture program director for the Izaak Walton League of America.
Minnesota farmers, who grow crops under land conservation programs dating back to 1985, say they have no problem with maintaining practices designed to preserve native grasses and protect highly erodible land.
"The vast majority of farmers are in compliance," said Northfield corn and soybean producer Bruce Peterson, of the Minnesota Corn Growers Association. "We don't want to see environmental degradation, either."
However, with farm aid shifting from a system of direct payments to crop insurance subsidies, some farm groups say federally mandated conservation compliance might keep farmers from signing up for coverage and may no longer be necessary.