A top University of Minnesota athletic official who oversees Gophers fundraising has violated the school's sexual harassment policy, according to the results of an internal investigation, a source confirmed Thursday.
The nature of the violation involving Randy Handel, an associate athletic director, has not been disclosed. It's also not known who accused him or whether he's been disciplined. The university placed him on paid leave Tuesday.
U officials, including those on the Board of Regents, said Thursday that they won't comment on reports of an investigation by the Office of Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action (EOAA), saying personnel issues are private. Attempts to reach Handel at his home, his office and by phone were unsuccessful.
News of the EOAA investigation and finding was first reported Wednesday by KSTP-TV, which said it got information from a U regent who provided contents of an e-mail on the condition of anonymity.
Regents, incensed that information was leaked, met behind closed doors Thursday and agreed to launch an investigation to determine who provided the e-mail to the TV station.
Jim Carter, a onetime Gophers football star who ran unsuccessfully for regent, said he learned about the investigation at least three weeks ago. He declined to identify the person who gave him the information but added, "It didn't come from a regent." Carter said he didn't see the report but was told "the EOAA found in favor of the victim."
The 12 regents and U employees who had access to the memo are being asked to sign affidavits stating they did not share the confidential memo or its contents with reporters or anyone else. The board also will hire outside counsel and experts to conduct a forensic investigation of electronic communications of people who had access to the memo.
"We strive to uphold tremendous fiduciary responsibilities that require us always to act professionally and ethically, and to maintain privacy and other legal expectations," said Dean Johnson, the board chairman. "So it is greatly disappointing that we are faced with the potential that a member of the university community may have betrayed the public's trust.