Minnesota colleges will be facing intense competition when they search for new leaders in the coming year, as pandemic fatigue, political tensions and other stressors contribute to turnover at universities across the nation.
Four of the state's public schools — including the University of Minnesota — will be searching for new presidents in 2024, as will a smattering of private schools. The trustees and regents who oversee the high-profile hires acknowledge it's one of the most important tasks they'll undertake.
"This is a consequential conversation, a consequential moment for the university," said Mike Kenyanya, co-vice chair of the U's Board of Regents.
The Chronicle of Higher Education, one of most popular places for colleges to post jobs, had listings for 130 presidents, chancellors and vice presidents this month. Data from education groups suggest there could be more vacancies coming. More than half of presidents surveyed by the American Council on Education said they expect to step down within five years.
"Presidents are fatigued," said Judith Wilde, a research professor in the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University, whose work has focused in part on presidential searches.
Wilde said presidents are reporting higher levels of stress after years responding to the coronavirus pandemic and enrollment drops that are exacerbating financial challenges. Presidents in some states with Republican majorities, such as Texas and Florida, also face new legal restrictions on what they can teach and bans on diversity programs. And campus leaders are facing scrutiny amid the Israel-Hamas war, as complaints about antisemitism and Islamophobia rise.
Wilde said the nature of the job is changing, with presidents expected to spend a larger amount of time with donors, and that an increasing number of searches are resulting in "failed presidencies."
"We don't necessarily mean they were bad presidents, what we mean is they didn't last more than about two years," Wilde said, adding that often occurred because the candidates weren't vetted thoroughly enough by search firms to ensure they were a good match.