Winning ugly in the NFL has gotten a lot prettier and far less appreciated in the NFL the last 50 years.
On Nov. 14, 1971, Vikings coach Bud Grant had this to say after his team beat a bad Packers squad in perhaps the ugliest game in 61 seasons of Vikings football:
"We made a lot of big plays. They didn't make any."
The Vikings won 3-0 on a windy, 45-degree day at Met Stadium. Gary Cuozzo completed five of 11 passes for 42 yards. The Vikings had 87 yards and five first downs. The Packers ran for 245 yards but turned the ball over four times.
The Packers would have won, too, if quarterback Scott Hunter hadn't brain-burped and thrown the ball from the Vikings 8-yard line instead of adding to John Brockington's 169 yards rushing in the closing minutes of a scoreless game.
Charlie West intercepted the ball. The Vikings mustered some yards. Fred Cox kicked the winning 25-yard field goal in the final minute. People were happy, as they used to be pre-Twitter.
Yes, the game has changed massively since then. A game like that wouldn't fly in today's world, which is why the league started changing rules in 1978 to give us the wide-open product we see today.
But winning ugly is still a thing. It's just prettier to some of us who don't spend October looking at losses as valuable tools to get everybody fired and rise higher in the draft.