The number of muskrats trapped for their fur in Minnesota dropped last year to about 19,000, the lowest on record.
Biologists say a number of factors are at play in that drop, including fewer trappers. But it may also reflect the semiaquatic mammal's long-term decline in much of the country, including Minnesota, that experts say is tied to the loss and erosion of wetland habitats muskrats need to survive.
People still see muskrats in lakes, streams, marshes — even drainage ditches — but trapping data are the only regular measurements of muskrat populations in Minnesota. Muskrats have received little attention from researchers, though they're likened to bison in the importance to their landscape.
Muskrats have declined across the country since the 1970s, although the dropoff is most significant in the southeast United States, according to Adam Ahlers, a wildlife ecologist at Kansas State University who researches muskrat.
"They're kind of like ghosts moving across the plane between water and air," Ahlers said. "We just see them for a split second. If we lose them, we lose a charismatic creature that's been doing great things for us."
Not considered endangered or threatened, the population of muskrat in Minnesota likely numbers in the "hundreds of thousands," said Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) furbearer research biologist John Erb.
Taking into account the number of muskrats trapped per attempt, data suggests Minnesota muskrats have been "fairly stable" over the past 17 years, despite the number trapped declining from 243,360 to 18,890 during that time, Erb said.
Erb chalked the drop to low fur prices, weather, trappers retiring and the possibility of fewer animals.