Wells Fargo gets $203 million slap for overdraft policies

The practice isn't unique to Wells Fargo, but a judge says the bank improperly maximized overdraft fees

August 13, 2010 at 2:53PM

My colleague Chris Serres reported this week on one of the hottest of the hot buttons that Whistleblower hears about: bank overdraft fees. A federal judge ordered Wells Fargo to pay $203 million in restitution to its California customers for its "practice of processing larger checks and debit-card payments before smaller ones, rather than in the actual order," Serres wrote. The policy maximizes overdraft fees, a revenue source that's lucrative for banks but that has enraged customers and members of Congress. Here's one excerpt of Judge William Alsup's ruling:

While Wells Fargo said it would appeal the decision, the big questions on many consumers' minds are these: will anybody other than California customers get any restitution? And what about every other bank that does this?

about the writer

about the writer

James Shiffer

More from No Section

See More
FILE -- A rent deposit slot at an apartment complex in Tucker, Ga., on July 21, 2020. As an eviction crisis has seemed increasingly likely this summer, everyone in the housing market has made the same plea to Washington: Send money — lots of it — that would keep renters in their homes and landlords afloat. (Melissa Golden/The New York Times) ORG XMIT: XNYT58
Melissa Golden/The New York Times

It’s too soon to tell how much the immigration crackdown is to blame.