To care providers, advocates and parents of children with autism, the development of the Early Intensive Developmental and Behavioral Intervention (EIDBI) health care program in Minnesota is so promising and so long-awaited, it’s no wonder its growth has been explosive.
But because of that surge of interest in the program, which serves people younger than 21 with autism spectrum disorder, and the lack of oversight, advocates and providers weren’t completely surprised by the revelations last week that the FBI is investigating alleged fraud at two — and possibly more — EIDBI centers.
“The state was interested in providing access to needed services [and] equity-based access to long-underserved communities,” said Eric Larsson, executive director of clinical services at the Lovaas Institute Midwest in Minneapolis. “And, if everyone follows the rules, there’s no problem. Not everyone followed the rules.”
The program is funded by the state and federal government. Since 2017, the state reported nearly $700 million in Medicaid EIDBI reimbursements. That includes nearly $229 million in 2024 payments through Nov. 27. At the same time, the number of EIDBI providers who diagnose and treat people with autism spectrum disorder increased from 41 in 2018 to 328 last year.
Last week, the FBI raided St. Cloud and Minneapolis autism centers as part of an investigation it said revealed “substantial evidence” of millions of dollars in fraudulent Medicaid claims. No charges have been filed yet.
That alleged fraud overlaps with the Feeding Our Future case, which has charged 70 people with defrauding a federal program of $250 million meant to pay for meals provided to low-income kids in Minnesota after school and during the summer. According to the FBI affidavit, at least a dozen of the 70 defendants also “owned, received money from, or were associated” with autism centers.
The allegations involving the autism centers threatens to set back the many years of hard work by providers and parents in Minnesota, Larsson said, “because people are going to lump it together in one broad category.”
Those alleged “bad apples,” autism experts fear, are not only damaging reputations of honest providers but may threaten future funding.