Pete Grebner remembers what it was like to juggle a Como High School classroom with too many students, conducting chemistry lessons during which half the room did lab work while the other half read from a textbook.
He considers it a triumph that the St. Paul Federation of Educators secured class size limits in its tentative contract agreement with the state's second-largest school district. Until now, class size caps were routinely part of standalone memorandums of understanding between St. Paul Public Schools and its teachers union.
"It needed to be a permanent thing," said Grebner, now a teacher on special assignment for the St. Paul district and a member of the union's bargaining team.
Similar contract language is also up for negotiation in Minneapolis, where the teachers remain on strike. But if class-size caps are adopted there, the Twin Cities districts will be the first in the state to limit the number of students in their classrooms by way of contract language.
Districts typically avoid setting firm caps because sudden shifts in enrollment one year may require a school to hire another teacher, giving them less flexibility to adjust on the fly, said Kirk Schneidawind, executive director of the Minnesota School Boards Association.
"There's definitely a cost to the district by doing this," Schneidawind said.
The negotiations in St. Paul and Minneapolis echo a larger national conversation and reflect the scattershot approach to limits on class sizes.
In some states, including Texas and Arkansas, class sizes are dictated by state law. California caps enrollment in prekindergarten through third grade classrooms but allows unions to bargain on limits in upper grades. Until this January, Oregon barred teachers unions from negotiating with their districts on class sizes.