The good news delivered by Minnesota leaders Wednesday is that the state projects a $2.4 billion surplus for the two-year budget cycle that began in July.
Then came the bad news: Lawmakers might not get to spend it, a disappointing revelation for constituencies who are amassing legislative wish-lists.
How could that be? The surplus will be consumed in the coming years by rising costs of state services, such as long-term care for people with disabilities and free school meals for everyone. If lawmakers spend the surplus elsewhere, state officials said, Minnesota could face a $2.3 billion shortfall starting in July 2025.
Gov. Tim Walz and legislative leaders have acknowledged they must show some fiscal restraint when they return to the State Capitol in February. This year, the DFL-controlled Legislature used a much larger $17.5 billion surplus to pass a slate of progressive policies and a two-year $72 billion budget — the largest in state history.
GOP legislators blamed Walz and the Democrats last week for the projected deficit, saying they squandered the larger surplus and put the state in a financially precarious position.
Minnesota Management and Budget Commissioner Erin Campbell said "some of the drivers come from decisions that were made last legislative session, but that's just a part of the story."
Her department's lengthy economic forecast report shows a mix of factors. Here's what's driving Minnesota to swing from a projected surplus into a shortfall, according to the state budget agency.
Education spending up
FY24-25 projection: $205 million above budget