Minnesota's most selective colleges enrolled increasingly diverse classes in the decade before the U.S. Supreme Court overturned affirmative action, a ruling that limits administrators' ability to consider race in admissions decisions.
But it will likely be years before college leaders have the data to know whether the controversial decision in June will undo that progress — or whether other recruitment techniques will attract students from a variety of backgrounds.
"I think the spirit of affirmative action was one of deliberately or intentionally building the future we wanted to see for the country," said Suzanne Rivera, president of Macalester College in St. Paul. "So the challenge we're facing now is how to continue advancing on that goal."
Both Macalester and Carleton colleges — the two most selective in the state — increased the percentage of students of color enrolling in their undergraduate programs between 2011 and 2021, according to a Star Tribune analysis of data compiled by the U.S. Department of Education. Still, the institutions remained predominantly white.
Similar trends played out on the University of Minnesota's Twin Cities campus, one of the largest public institutions in the state that considered race prior to this summer's court ruling.
Experts caution that it's difficult to determine how many of the diversity gains could be a result of affirmative action policies vs. other factors. In recent years, some schools have brought on additional recruiters or boosted programs for first-generation or low-income students. The country's demographics are also shifting, partly due to changes in birth rates years ago.
Affirmative action policies, which trace back to the civil rights movement of the 1960s, were designed to improve educational prospects for historically excluded groups, including women and people of color. For decades, courts ruled that colleges could consider race alongside other factors such as a student's grades, test scores, extracurricular activities or track record in leadership roles.
"Lots of those students could get in even without affirmative action," said Zachary Bleemer, an assistant professor of economics at Princeton University who studies affirmative action and university application processes. "So the challenge is figuring out which students, absent the affirmative action bump, would have gotten in anyway, and that's not directly observable. It's not like there's any mark on these applications."