Recyclable materials zip along a conveyor belt in Shakopee as workers scramble to grab what doesn't belong: Plastic bags, shredded paper, clothes hangers, a giant poster of Garfield.
It's all evidence of "wish-cycling," the well-intended pitching of trash into the big blue single-sort recycling bins in hopes that it can, somehow, be recycled. But those unwanted items are a headache for recyclers, who are left with gummed-up sorting machines, less valuable recyclables and a pile of trash.
A group of recyclers, waste haulers, and city, county and state officials has been meeting for the past year to develop clearer and more consistent guidelines for the public about what's acceptable to toss in curbside recycling bins — and what's not.
"People want to do the right thing," said Julie Moore, who leads a local group representing city recycling managers. "And we need to make it easy for them to do that."
Part of the confusion stems from the patchwork of recycling practices that vary by city and their chosen hauler. Jocelyn Cronin of Mendota Heights said it feels like the message is "recycle everything" followed by a long list of caveats. And she doesn't want to miss an opportunity to recycle something that is recyclable.
"I err on the side of I would rather give it to them, and even if it's not recyclable, think they'll take care of it," said Cronin, who stopped by a recycling information booth at a local park event.
Residents' hopeful habits mean 6 to 8 percent of the material at typical local recycling facilities is "residual" — trash destined for landfills or incinerators. State law says recyclers must pay a tax penalty if that residual amount rises above 15 percent.
Cities have also pushed haulers to accept more materials, unaware of what happens down the line, to boost the collection amounts that determine county funding for their programs. Haulers competing for contracts agreed to take materials that cause problems or have limited markets to be made into new products.