Did tackling money goals one at a time cost financial literacy expert Barbara O'Neill at least $1 million?
That's how much O'Neill, a professor at Rutgers University, said she figures she lost by starting to save for retirement only after she had created an emergency fund, bought a car with cash and purchased a home.
"I tell students that eventually, 30 years later, I hit the million-dollar mark, but I could've had $2 million," O'Neill said.
Too often, financial experts say, people want to attack their money goals one at a time: "As soon as I pay off my credit card debt, then I'll start saving for a home," or, "As soon as I pay off my student loan debt, then I'll start saving for retirement."
These folks don't realize how costly the words "as soon as" can be.
Debt payments shouldn't dictate other goals
Paying off debt is a worthy goal, but it shouldn't come at the expense of other goals, particularly saving for retirement. Company matches and tax breaks are not retroactive. And the sooner money is contributed, the longer it can benefit from compounded returns.
Compounded returns are when your investment gains earn their own gains, which can dramatically increase your balances over time.
"By putting off saving for the future, you are really inhibiting yourself from benefiting from that wonderful magic," said Kimberly Zimmerman Rand, an accredited financial counselor and principal at Dragonfly Financial Solutions in Boston. "If you can start saving today … you are going to have a lot more five years from now than if you decide to pay off debt for three years and start saving in year four."