For 10 years after college, I toiled in restaurants around the Twin Cities and then out East. It is a tale familiar to thousands of Minnesotans scraping together an income (if not a living) in tavern work and dining — one of our economy's most celebrated if unaccountable employers.
This being a Sunday, many such workers are sleeping late as you read these words, a consolation prize of wet cash on their nightstand but few plans for the day when a new manager might come along to shuffle up the schedule, potentially vaporizing their ability to make rent.
Sore feet, inscrutable bosses and the scramble for tips have been recognized as the standard fare of waiting tables since the start of time, or at least since the creation of Joanna, the Chotchkie's dinner house waitress, played by Jennifer Aniston, chided for wearing only the minimum amount of flair in the cult classic "Office Space."
But the lack of worker protections has always been the real downside to the gig. This has finally gained notice, thanks to a movement to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour, as well as to the proposed city of Minneapolis "Working Families Agenda" measures.
Many of these measures are now on hold, but among the items that have been/are being considered are mandating sick pay, doing away with end-arounds on overtime law and, in a finely attuned reading of the gig, lessening some of the financial chaos of work in a widely popular industry where schedules are routinely torn up and rewritten from hour to hour.
Supporters of such regulations say these are practices that keep restaurant and other service workers in poverty. They say that if office workers can plan on a schedule and a semblance of income a month or two weeks in advance, servers should be afforded the same respect. Opponents say that restaurant owners require flexibility in staffing to handle the unpredictability of their business and protect thin margins. Some have argued the ordinance would send businesses fleeing (they forget about location, location, location).
It's hard to say who is right here, other than to note that the restaurant industry has clearly relied on expectations about employees that effectively rule out anyone with a child, better options of any kind or an overhead greater than that of your typical 21-year-old. If restaurants can't tolerate the same inefficiencies that accompany your typical office job, it might suggest a broken business model all along.
Whatever the outcome of reform efforts, there are other explanations for why servers have toiled under such unserious working conditions and will likely continue to do so — and they go beyond desperation.