The moment Augsburg University professor Christina Erickson almost lost it with her young daughters sent her on a journey to answer the question: What does spanking do to our kids, and why does our society accept it?
She was seething in the kitchen, trying to make dinner and take a phone call before heading out to a work meeting, while her toddlers tussled over purple ponies despite Erickson's pleas to share. She threw down the spatula and followed her urge to spank them.
But before Erickson's hand could smack a tiny bottom, she changed her mind. Her white-hot anger took her aback.
"It struck me as bizarre," Erickson told me. "These are children I wanted for years, and here I was about to hit them. In that moment, I saw the absurdity."
Erickson, after all, was not only a college professor, but a social worker. Much of her life's work focused on children and families. Her friends would describe her as kind and peace-loving. Why was she about to strike two little humans she loved the most?
That moment of reckoning led to more than a decade of trying to understand the research behind spanking, a trove of findings she details in her new book, "Spanked: How Hitting Our Children Is Harming Ourselves."
Erickson — a child of the '70s — "was spanked and turned out fine," a popular argument she deconstructs and eviscerates. When she first set out to write the book, she figured it would amount to neutral analysis of how spanking came to be a commonly accepted discipline tool. She wasn't going to take a stand. Her first draft even included a section with step-by-step directions on how to safely spank a child.
Yet Erickson was so convinced by the reams of research demonstrating spanking's harm — from increased aggression to mental health problems — that she produced an entirely different book, one that could inform both parents and professionals.