I'm a financial do-it-yourselfer. And an eager one at that.
It's a good January day when a tax form lands in my mailbox. I diligently scour credit card statements in search of fraud and routinely perform gut checks for whether we're spending too much on lunches out or Amazon downloads. (Yes and yes.)
As for long-term financial planning, we're in pretty good shape. We invest using mainly low-cost index funds. We take advantage of company matching funds and fully fund our Roth individual retirement accounts. We ignore chatter, and invest on schedule, in good markets and bad.
Yet this normally content DIY-er is feeling less sanguine. The kids are growing; the college funds aren't. We're still living in our starter home, but tortured by a compulsion to be conservative on the one hand and more comfortable on the other. And the constant hum of wants, needs, should-dos and must-dos is driving me nuts.
I've been finding myself (gasp) wondering if we could use an outside opinion.
Just 17 percent of Americans use a financial adviser, according to the 2013 CEB Iconoculture Consumer Insights Values and Lifestyle Quantitative Survey. When respondents asked why they did not work with an adviser, popular reasons included cost (''It's too expensive'') and lack of need ("My finances are simple'').
But the financial planning model has been shape-shifting in recent years as new entrants, new pricing structures and new technologies evolve to offer advice to the masses. When I started writing this column in 2004, there were few options for people who didn't want a full-blown relationship with an adviser.
Now there's also a bevy of what Michael Kitces calls "cyborg" options for your financial planning needs. Over the past decade-plus we've gone from warily buying a book on Amazon to purchasing anything and everything online.