With just nine days until election day, supporters and opponents of the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment are making final efforts to sway voters.
"It's gone from a marathon to a sprint to the finish line," said Ken Martin, campaign director of Vote Yes Minnesota.
Last week, the Vote Yes campaign traveled to 17 cities in three days. And this week, former Vikings coach Bud Grant and conservation group leaders will hold rallies in support of the constitutional amendment in St. Paul and seven other cities.
Meanwhile, opponents have launched their first TV ad, which warns Minnesotans not to be "fooled" by claims that the state's waters aren't safe for fishing and swimming. Supporters have been airing TV ads for several weeks focusing on the state's polluted waters.
Voters will see more TV, radio and mail advertising from both sides in coming days.
Vote Yes Minnesota -- a coalition of 350 groups, including conservation, hunting, environmental and arts groups -- is spending nearly $5 million in its campaign. Groups like the Nature Conservancy, Ducks Unlimited, Pheasants Forever and the Minnesota Deer Hunters Association have urged their members to support the amendment.
Phil Krinkie, president of the Taxpayers League of Minnesota, which opposes the amendment, has said his group likely will spend less than $500,000. The TV ad will have a limited run on cable TV stations in the Twin Cities. The group has been distributing "Vote No" signs at Republican offices around the state, which has drawn the ire of some Republican supporters of the amendment.
The amendment would increase the state sales tax by three-eighths of 1 percent, raising about $270 million annually for 25 years. Thirty-three percent would be used to develop and improve fish and wildlife habitat, and a citizens-legislative council would oversee spending; another 33 percent would clean up Minnesota's lakes and rivers. Arts and cultural projects would get 19.75 percent, and parks and trails would get 14.25 percent.