Days after St. Paul reached its 29th homicide of 2019, police Chief Todd Axtell sent Mayor Melvin Carter an e-mail making his case for buying a gunshot detection system called ShotSpotter.
The technology, the chief said, could help officers respond to and investigate shootings faster, "and bring a sense of calm to our neighborhoods, which are on edge due to the rise in gun-related deaths."
The mayor was skeptical. In his response, he laid out research showing ShotSpotter doesn't always work — and even when it does, it doesn't necessarily reduce crime.
"The available data is inconclusive at best," he wrote.
As St. Paul grapples with a spike in gun violence and a homicide total that's reached a 25-year high, the city's mayor and police chief are divided on whether new technology is the answer. While the chief argues gunshot detection software is "a lifeline," Carter says it's a "technological toy." The split between the two leaders reflects disagreement in St. Paul and across the country about whether systems like ShotSpotter actually help reduce gun violence.
About 100 cities worldwide use ShotSpotter, with varying results. In Minneapolis, which has had the technology since 2006, some council members want to expand the network into neighborhoods that have previously gone uncovered. In St. Louis, researchers found that humans were better and cheaper for detecting gunshots.
In St. Paul, law enforcement officials and community leaders advocating for ShotSpotter acknowledge it's not an end-all solution, but say they still want to see how it works in their city. St. Paul has reached 30 homicides, 27 of which were by gunshot; as of Nov. 18, police have responded to 1,134 calls of shots fired.
"Our homicide investigators, our detectives and officers are working tirelessly on this problem," a visibly tired and frustrated Axtell said during a recent interview. "They're absolutely exhausted."