Minnesota's attorney general could gain sweeping authority over health care mergers, especially the Fairview-Sanford merger that could result in out-of-state control of the University of Minnesota's teaching hospital.
A proposal gaining momentum in the Legislature would prohibit hospital and clinic mergers that "substantially lessen competition," and empower the attorney general to go to court to block or unwind any transactions that don't benefit Minnesota.
Reduced competition can mean higher costs for everyone, because larger health care systems can command higher prices that result in higher insurance premiums, said Rep. Robert Bierman, DFL-Apple Valley, the lead author of the bill.
"We're on an unsustainable trajectory with health care costs and we all know that," he said. "The question is, what do we do about it? This is one thing we can do to address one segment of it."
Bierman's bill was amended Monday to focus on larger mergers and exempt smaller, rural hospitals and clinics from its reporting requirements.
The bill's most immediate impact would be widening the scope of Attorney General Keith Ellison's review of the Fairview-Sanford merger — beyond whether it simply conforms with state charitable and business laws. Control of U health care facilities by any out-of-state or for-profit entities would be banned unless Ellison determined that it would be in Minnesotans' public interest.
The amended proposal will likely be included in a House health budget bill scheduled for a vote Wednesday. The Senate already approved its version, so lawmakers from both chambers would have to iron out the differences before sending a final version to Gov. Tim Walz.
The merger under consideration would put South Dakota-based Sanford Health in charge of Fairview's network of clinics and 10 mostly Twin Cities hospitals, including the University of Minnesota Medical Center.