Despite Gov. Mark Dayton's objections, six massive paintings depicting Minnesota soldiers in Civil War battles will be rehung in the Governor's Reception Room and anteroom at the newly renovated State Capitol.
The Minnesota Historical Society's (MNHS) executive council voted unanimously Thursday to reinstall the century-old paintings that were temporarily removed during the Capitol's $310 million renovation. The board decided that honoring veterans and maintaining the room's historical integrity trumped arguments that the room should feature a broader array of art.
"The preservation argument is compelling," said Executive Council member Eric Ahlness, a retired colonel with the Minnesota Army National Guard. "The Capitol is the place where people can learn about military history and learn about it in a context that honors the service of the veterans of the Civil War and beyond."
Rep. Dean Urdahl, R-Grove City, a retired history teacher, said he was pleased that the paintings will stay. Public sentiment, he said, was overwhelmingly behind keeping them up.
"It was the right decision to make," he said. "One of the most important things Minnesota has done for our nation's history should be commemorated in the most important room in the most important building in the state."
The future of some of the Civil War artwork had become a bone of contention between Dayton and some prominent Republicans, including House Speaker Kurt Daudt, R-Crown, who urged that the art be returned to its former spots. Dayton wanted the paintings removed and replaced with works of art that "more completely depict our great state's varied history." He was so impassioned about the issue that he stormed out of a meeting on the topic last week.
On Thursday, the governor issued a one-sentence statement: "It's their decision to make and I accept their decision."
The paintings are a familiar backdrop on TV and in photographs of the Governor's Reception Room, which is often used for ceremonies and news conferences. The Capitol is on the National Register of Historic Places for both its architecture and its artwork, and under state law, the historical society — a nonprofit independent of the state but largely funded by it — had the final say on what to show there.