Two years before he allegedly shot and killed a Mendota Heights police officer, Brian Fitch Sr. stood charged with beating and threatening a man he suspected of having sex with his girlfriend.
Dakota County prosecutors, citing the 39-year-old career criminal's lengthy record, warned that he was a "violent offender" and recommended that he be sent to prison for three years — the maximum sentence state guidelines allowed. That didn't happen.
Instead, a judge in May 2013 sentenced Fitch, who had written him fervent letters saying that he was straightening out his life, to the 211 days he had spent in jail and ordered him into the Minnesota Adult and Teen Challenge residential drug-treatment program, beginning this past February.
In May, records show, Fitch was dismissed as "unsuccessful" and told to turn himself in to authorities. He never did.
Now, as Fitch faces first-degree murder charges in the shooting death of veteran officer Scott Patrick during a routine traffic stop Wednesday in West St. Paul, some law enforcement officials are questioning whether he was treated too leniently.
Dakota County Attorney James Backstrom said Friday that Judge Richard Spicer's decision to send Fitch to drug treatment instead of the maximum allowed prison term was "not appropriate for violent criminals."
Even before his 2012 criminal case, Fitch rarely landed in jail long for other offenses. Instead, his record reveals a string of plea deals, dismissed charges, treatment options and suspended prison sentences that would take effect only if he violated probation.
That emerging portrait has provoked frustration among some in law enforcement after officer Patrick's killing, even as they acknowledge that hindsight in the justice system is 20-20 and that judges often face excruciating decisions in criminal cases.