After nearly a year and 11 trials, 3M's courtroom battle over its military earplugs still rages on with no end in sight — and Wall Street is increasingly worried about a potential multibillion-dollar threat to the company.
Former or active military members, who claim 3M knowingly made defective earplugs that damaged their hearing, have won six trials. The Maplewood-based company, which claims the earplugs are safe, has won five.
Without a settlement, thousands more cases will go to trial in what has become the largest U.S. mass tort ever. Two stock analysts recently estimated total payouts to plaintiffs could be around $15 billion.
"Right now, it looks like a 50-50 shot the plaintiffs will win," said Alexandra Lahav, a professor at the University of Connecticut School of Law. Their ratio of victories shows "there is merit to their cases. ... The plaintiffs right now have a lot of leverage, and 3M is thinking, how can we turn the tide?"
3M says it is "confident" in its case and has begun appealing jury verdicts it lost.
Recently filed appellate court documents show that 3M is reasserting the "government contractor" defense. A potentially powerful tool, the defense shields companies from tort liability for defects in products designed and developed for the federal government.
3M has claimed its earplugs were designed in close collaboration with the military. But Casey Rodgers, the U.S. District judge in Florida presiding over the earplug case, rejected 3M's government contractor plea in 2020.
The lawsuit avalanche centers on the Combat Arms or CAEv2 earplug, which a company called Aearo Technologies began selling to the U.S. Army in the late 1990s. 3M bought Aearo in 2008 and continued sell the CAEv3 until 2015, dominating the military earplug market.